• Liz Cheney Plans to Ride Myth to Republican Presidential Nomination

    I think the thing that bothers me the most (because there are so many things) about Liz Cheney, whom Harriet Hageman just nuclear exploded the crap out of in Wyoming’s Republican primary, booting Cheney from her House seat, is her subterfuge. The myth she’s created is that she is somehow “saving” democracy, by taking down President Donald Trump. She even compared herself to Abraham Lincoln “saving our democracy.”

    The myth isn’t in Cheney’s blatant, debilitating hate for President Donald Trump—that seems real enough. It would be fine if she just despised him for whatever fantasy crimes against democracy she feels he committed, regarding Jan. 6th, 2020. Have at it. She’s not alone.

    However, she’s a lawyer. She knows exactly what she was participating in when she agreed to co-chair that “star chamber” House Select Committee on Jan 6th. A committee that, among other things, would not allow opposing witnesses or cross-examination. You can call it what you want, but if you call it fair or looking for justice, as Cheney apparently does, you’re lying.

    Again, she knows this this is a “kangaroo court,” yet she is participating anyway because of her myth-making that President Trump is a threat to democracy because he brought up the 2020 voting slime that we all saw with our own eyes and then saw when watching Dinesh D’Souza’s “2000 Mules.”

    She also knows all the exculpatory evidence the Committee and Nancy Pelosi are holding back, regarding surveillance video footage of the event, the supposed bombs planted at the RNC and DNC on Jan. 5th, the deployment decisions for the Capitol police and the National Guard, the alleged FBI agents or informants inciting the crowd on Jan. 6th (Ray Epps), and so much more.

    Yet, now it appears likely she plans to ride this myth to a presidential bid—as a Republican. Well, one of the biggest trouncings in a federal election in the past century is a weird way to do it. But I say, go with your strengths, Liz.     

  • Biden Regime Economic Devastation Goes too Far: Beer Shortage

    I was listening to Glenn Beck’s radio show before the Biden regime’s raid on President Donald Trump’s home, but it’s still worth discussing, as it ties in. Beck dropped a thought experiment that, well… made me think (nice work Glenn) and want to ask questions.

    After interviewing a guest who was a tad pessimistic about the survival of the United States of America as we’ve known it and as the Founders intended it, Beck wondered how we go forward. He wondered if we would have another civil war. 

    To avoid civil war, Beck pondered whether our nation might need another “slavery compromise” over today’s arguable moral equivalent of slavery: abortion.

    At the time of the Constitution, though most of the Framers denounced slavery as an institution (even many slaveholders did), some southern states would not have ratified the document if it fully abolished slavery immediately. 

    John W. York, formerly of The Heritage Foundation, wrote, “The Founders were under no illusions that slavery was in any way consonant with the principles at the very foundation of our regime.” 

    He cites anti-slavery quotes from the most famous of the Founders:

    “‘… [E]very measure of prudence, therefore, ought to be assumed for the eventual total extirpation of slavery from the United States …. I have, through my whole life, held the practice of slavery in abhorrence … .’—John Adams, Letter to Evans, 1819.”

    “‘Slavery is … an atrocious debasement of human nature.’—Benjamin Franklin, an Address to the Public from the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, 1789.”

    “‘There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of [slavery].’—George Washington, Letter to Morris, 1786.”

    But they did compromise, which allowed this great nation to come into existence while trusting the inevitable end of slavery to future generations. And it worked. Although, no one can deny the high cost and the suffering of so many during the interim. 

    Beck suggested that America, as divided as it is, may need to move forward by agreeing to another “compromise,” this time with abortion. Beck offered some suggestions (thinking out loud) that Americans could compromise on to move forward.

    In this compromise, abortion would continue in all 50 states, but no new abortion clinics could be built anywhere. Similar to actions how no new slaves could be imported into the U.S. Americans would have to depend on a similar “expiration date” dependent on further human enlightenment.

    Beck’s ideas were interesting, and I understand his impetus based on his iron grasp of the Constitution. However, why should the left compromise when they can continue lying, cheating, and ignoring the law? Which we are now seeing with the raid on Trump’s home in Florida.

    Despite this proclivity, Beck’s notion struck me for a different reason. I thought about slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries compared with abortion in the 20th and 21st centuries. 

    Are the two evil institutions more similar than we may think? Ironically, it’s primarily the Democrats who’ve, in each of these time periods, favored preserving each of these barbaric institutions.

    With slavery, there was never any doubt those in bondage were human beings (though racists considered them “inferior”). Its proponents simply reduced the slaves’ humanity to where they could be considered property, and the owners could exploit their labor–and worse. 

    Similarly, with abortion, proponents refuse to recognize a prenatal human being’s humanity, and not only for religious reasons, but also despite the growing human beings having their own unique DNA. 

    Similar to a slave, the pro-abortion factions reduce or even negate a prenatal baby’s humanity so he or she can be considered the sole “property” of the woman (who is responsible for only half the DNA) and who then justifies destroying that “property” at will—as slave owners did with their “property.”

    Many people have seen, either at its release or since, the phenomenally successful mini-series, Roots. Remember Chuck Connor’s character, Tom Moore, a brutal slave master? This YouTube scene involving Moore and his female slave, “Kizzy,” is called, “It’s not rape if she’s your property….”

    Similarly, with abortion, I suppose, it’s not murder if the baby is your property–rather than an individual human being.

    The wicked similarity was bolstered when a ghoulish Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) spoke so blood-chillingly about abortion. She wants to, according to the Post Millennial, close crisis pregnancy centers that help women choose to keep their babies. That used to be a good thing on all sides of the issue. But Warren says helping them keep their babies “tortures women.”

    I swore I was about to see her teeth sweat, her eyes morph red, and a coat of coarse grey fur sprout from her skin. And she doesn’t even need a full moon. I thought about the Roots’ scene mentioned above and how it’s not rape if she’s your property, and it’s not murder if…. The bloodlust is chilling, indeed.

    Liz “Mags Sanger” Warren said, “In Massachusetts right now, the crisis pregnancy centers are there to fool people who are looking for pregnancy termination help outnumber true abortion clinics by 3:1. We need to shut them down here in Massachusetts and we need to shut them down all around the country. You should not be able to torture a pregnant person like that.”

    Think about just how ugly that statement is—on so many levels. First, it’s totalitarian. Second, it’s malevolent. And third, it’s senseless—unless you’re not just “pro-choice,” but you’re not only pro-abortion but also anti-pregnancy.

    Democrats have kissed bye-bye to Bill Clinton’s “abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.”  

    Could it be, as with slaveholders, that people like Warren do not see some human beings as human? During a human’s existence, which rudimentary science tells us begins at conception and continues until death, he or she will pass through many stages of life, some inside the womb, most outside. Since, from the moment of conception, there is life (as opposed to death or non-existence), how can ending an innocent person’s life at any stage of his or her existence be anything other than immoral?

    If someone wants to live in a state that allows the killing of prenatal human babies at all the various stages of pre-birth, they can do that. They can live in abortion states just as some people before the “slavery amendments” chose to live in slave states. Who was it who said, “the more things change, the more they remain the same?” 

  • Local Cops Will Suffer the Consequences of Biden Administration Ignoring Federal Immigration Law

    By Steve Pomper

    A porous U.S.-Mexico border affects law enforcement officers in two ways—at least. It affects federal cops and their state and local partners working the insanity at the border. Then it also affects state and local law enforcement officers as the illegal immigrants, within which criminals hide, flow into various communities across the United States. Of specific concern are the drug and sex traffickers—and possible terrorists.

    Simultaneously, the U.S. has  announced the opening of its legitimate ports-of-entry to “non-essential” Mexican and Canadian visitors to the U.S. Ironically, these legal visitors will need to show their “vaccine” papers to enter. Illegal immigrants may continue crossing the border with zero virus restrictions.  

    For those who wish to be informed and pay attention to the very few media sources reporting on the border, the catastrophe is obvious. The Biden administration has worked terribly hard to hide from the American people the disaster at the southern border. Reportedly, an overflow immigrant holding facility in Yuma, AZ. was recently ordered to be emptied in anticipation of a visit from Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC).

    But it gets worse. FOX News, in an exclusive report, headlined “Leaked Border Patrol docs show mass release of illegal immigrants into US by Biden administration.” Further, they’re released “often with little or no oversight.”

    The numbers are staggering, especially when you consider who is likely hiding within the masses of otherwise law-abiding illegal immigrants. Reportedly, the Biden administration has released, “at least, 160,000 illegal immigrants… into the U.S.” This includes a generous interpretation of “limited parole authorities” to issue work permits to illegal aliens.

    Fox News reported Border Patrol documents they obtained show the government made over 30,000 of those people “eligible for work permits since August.” This is adding low-skilled workers into an already devastated economy.

    On Twitter, FOX News’ Bill Melugin tweeted, “According to Border Patrol documents provided by a source, the federal gov has released over 70,000 illegal immigrants into the U.S. since August 6, including 31,977 released via parole (temp legal status, eligible for work permits). 94,570 released via NTR [Notice to Report] since 3/20.” Something similar has already happened that the U.S. should have learned from.

    I remember, even a year after I began my law enforcement career in 1992, police in cities across America were still dealing with an immigration crisis from 1980 exploited by Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro called the Mariel boatlift. Along with law-abiding Cuban refugees fleeing oppression, Castro opened his prisons and also sent dangerous criminals to the U.S.

    Of course, that immigration crisis primarily affected south Florida. But in a South Florida Sun-Sentinel article, they wrote that the “successes” of the majority decent immigrants assimilating into American life, were “overshadowed by the actions of an estimated 16,000 to 20,000 criminals and other misfits who have contributed to an alarming increase in South Florida crime.”

    As time passed, that crime problem drifted to other cities across the U.S. The Miami District Director of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Perry Rivkind, said, Castro “‘should be tried for moral complicity in murder, rape and robbery’ committed by Mariel criminals upon their arrival in the U.S.”

    Both the American and Cuban governments overtly or tacitly sanctioned the effort. Some 125,000 Cubans and 25,000 Haitians came to the U.S. between April and October 1980. Cuban exiles in the U.S. amassed some 1,700 boats with which to pick up immigrants at the Castro-authorized Port of Mariel in Cuba.

    But, according to ImmigrationHistory.org, “During this period, reports that the Cuban government also released prisoners to travel to the United States prompted the U.S. Coast Guard to blockade some 1,400 boats; however, hundreds of Cubans continued to arrive in Florida daily.”

    In 1993, investigated by my agency, a suspect raped and murdered Seattle musician Mia Zapata. It would take nearly 10 years to find, arrest, and prosecute her killer in 2004. In 2002, the Washington State Patrol Crime Lab had checked DNA evidence collected from Zapata’s body at the time of the crime.

    According to a story in Rolling Stone, the DNA matched “Jesus Mezquia, a fisherman living in Florida. A Cuban who came to the U.S. during the 1980 Mariel boatlift, Mezquia, reportedly had a criminal history that included robbery, kidnapping, and aggravated battery.” He died in prison this year on January 21st at 66 years of age while serving a 36-year sentence.

    There were many Jesus Mezquias back then and there will be more this time. 

    Today, there’s no foreign communist dictator to blame for dispersing illegal immigrant criminals (perhaps even terrorists) throughout America. We only have the Biden administration to blame. As time passes, police agencies will start reporting on illegal immigrant criminals who will be traced back to this deliberate border crisis.

    And the Mariel boatlift appears miniscule by comparison to the invasion America is now experiencing as the Biden administration continues to ignore federal immigration law. Currently, another 90,000 people are en route from South and Central America, along with others mixing with them from all over the world. The New York Post reported, as of July 2021, over one million illegal immigrants had crossed the border so far this year.  

    This comparison between then and now is important because it shows what cops today are likely to face because of these insane federal immigration policies. And this is happening as jurisdictions are defunding police, are losing officers because of atrocious treatment, and are now about to force more out the door because of “vaccine” mandates.

    Cops, who are already working with significant deficits, will have to deal with the consequences of these irresponsible federal and some state, county, and city policies. Hopefully, we won’t see the horror perpetrated against Mia Zapata committed against other people. But, frankly, even if the flow of illegal immigrants, including criminals, stopped today, I don’t see how we cannot.     

    <iframe “=”” src=”https://www.congressweb.com/NPA/3/?framed_parent_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnationalpolice.org%2Flocal-cops-will-suffer-the-consequences-of-biden-administration-ignoring-federal-immigration-law%2F&frame_is_responsive=true&frame_is_websticker=false&frame_hide_menu=false” scrolling=”no” width=”100%” height=”400″ frameborder=”0″>
  • Indiana Police Officer Pushes Back Against the NFL’s Offensive Line.

  • Antifa Arsonist Who Attempted to Kill Cops Gets 20 Months

  • Did teaching Our Kids to Fear and Hate Cops Lead to Shootout with 12 and 14-year-old?

    Posted on by admin

    By Steve Pomper

    What are we teaching our kids used to be a rhetorical question. Now, it’s an actual question in need of an answer. Leftist school administrators, school boards, and teachers’ unions not only tolerate Antifa and BLM violence but approve of it, support it, and even partake in it. And they are passing these toxic sentiments on to our children in our schools. Disturbing reports out of Portland, Oregon show several current, active public-school teachers who’ve taken part and have been arrested at Antifa riots. 

    Chris Rufo, the gold standard for critical race theory (CRT) resistance, recently wrote an article titled, “The Child Soldiers of Portland: Public schools are training children to become race-conscious revolutionaries.” Rufo explains how adults are brainwashing and radicalizing young children in CRT and BLM/Antifa culture. Rufo wrote, “Children as young as four marched with the crowd to the federal courthouse, raising the Black Power fist and chanting ‘Fuck the Police!’”

    And yet the legacy media continues to provide refuge for these, actually violent, insurrectionists who clamor for “Death to America.” Still, publications such as The New Yorker, continue unironically to label these militants “antifascists.” They wrote, “In July, President Donald Trump had claimed, without evidence, that anarchists were throwing soup cans at police during demonstrations for racial justice.” The writer even made light of arrested Antifa members joking, “this soup is for my family.”

    It is within this anarcho-Marxist indoctrination “soup” that brings us this disturbing story. The New York Post reported on a 12-year-old boy and a 14-year-old girl who ran away from a halfway home in Florida and later broke into a home. When the police arrived, the girl opened fire on the cops with a shotgun she’d acquired at the residence. Deputies eventually shot the armed girl who is in the hospital, stable, and recovering from two gunshot wounds. 

    Deputies attempted to contact the teens by tossing a cellphone into the house, which the two youths ignored and instead continued to shoot at the cops. Reportedly, during the 35-minute incident, the teens “fired at deputies four separate times….” The boy was allegedly armed with an AK-47, also obtained within the home. The Sheriff’s Office reported no wounded deputies. The involved deputies are now on administrative leave, which is standard for officer-involved shootings. 

    This may be conjecture, but from having dealt with the juvenile justice system myself, the leftist political bent was frequently on display. It appears Sheriff Mike Chitwood has a similar sentiment about the system in Florida. “I don’t know what to say. Where have we gone wrong that a 12- and 14-year-old think it’s OK to take on law enforcement?” 

    Well, when the leftist administration and staff continually “teach” our children that cops are evil and more likely to harm than help them, by definition, that’s what kids “learn.” Our school district recently eliminated the School Resource Officers.

    According to school officials, they “spoke with children of color” whom they say fear the police, which was their ostensible reason for sacking cops in schools. The police department reported being blindsided because they were not consulted, and they also asserted very positive relations between students and officers. School officials, on the other hand, went with their apparent preconceived notion: ACAB!

    In a video statement, Volusia Sheriff Chitwood referred disparagingly to the Florida Juvenile Justice System. He said, “A place called FUMCH… [is] a complete failure and disgrace to the juvenile justice system in the state of Florida.” He explained the runaway boy was insulin-dependent, needing insulin “every four hours.” He also mentioned the 14-year-old girl’s criminal history, which led directly to this incident. “[Y]ou may remember, over the last year or so [the girl] stole a bunch of puppies, gets put into a halfway house in Flagler County, burns the home down. So, what do they do? They send her to Volusia County….”       

    Based on the given information, we cannot confirm the attitude the staff at the halfway home has toward cops. Still, we can infer from the sheriff, and us cops who have many personal anecdotes the likely anti-police sentiment.

    I can’t count the number of times I responded to halfway houses for youths and to juvenile detention (juvy jail). But I can confidently predict, even several years ago, those kids were not getting lessons from staff on how to cooperate with the police. Here, it appears, as usual with leftist leaning juvenile justice facilities and staff, these two kids certainly didn’t have a warm and fuzzy for cops.  

    Sheriff Chitwood sums up the current anti-cop situation quite accurately. “I’m sad to say, thank God my career is starting to come to an end. Because I don’t know what the future of law enforcement looks like in this country.”

    The Left likes to preach incessantly about systemic this and systemic that. Well, there is a systemic breakdown in our nation, which the Left is perpetrating. They’ve hijacked the public education and juvenile justice systems, which they are using to indoctrinate our children against traditional America, generally, and, specifically, against America’s law enforcement officers.

    Isn’t it time, like Chris Rufo has, to join in the fight against CRT, BLM, and Antifa indoctrination in our schools? Aren’t our children, the future leaders of America, worth it?    

  • The Reality of Defund the Police on the Streets

  • Anti-Police Movement is Not an Organic Uprising; It is Organized and Well-Funded by the Nation’s Top Leftists

  • Race Color Blind Lessons from Children.

    Race Color Blind Lessons from Children

  • Pushback on Open Society Foundations’ Efforts to Purge Traditional Law and Order from American Society